bumimanusia


De-Gazetting of The Gunung Merapi National Park
Januari 16, 2007, 7:30 am
Filed under: sepenggal kasus

Gunung Merapi National Park was officially inaugurated on October 17th by President Megawati. The park covers 17,509 hectares on the slopes of two neighbouring volcanoes Mount Merapi and Mount Merbabu – located in the provinces of Central Java and Yogyakarta. Much of the area is forest controlled by state-owned forestry company, Perhutani. Some is land affected by regular eruptions. Other parts are farmed by local inhabitants. Only a few hundred hectares (at Plawangan Turbo) were already designated protected areas. The key decisions were made in November last year when Sultan Hamengku Buwono X, who is also governor of Yogyakarta, enthusiastically backed local forestry office plans. He described the proposed park as the ‘heart and soul’ of Yogyakarta. The main justifications seem to be the status symbol of creating a new national park, generating more income from tourism and access to reforestation funding. Critics of the national park point out that other administrative options could better protect the livelihoods of local communities, the water supply for rice farmers and the inhabitants of Yoygakarta, and the local flora and fauna. The plans were approved in April 2002 by the Department of Forestry which, despite regional autonomy, still has responsibility for nature conservation throughout
Indonesia.
Top-down planning The Forestry Department press release for the park’s opening describes Gunung Merapi as “a natural ecosystem which is still intact, comprising alpine habitat with meadows and shrubs and montane habitats with endemic species such as orchids (Vanda tricolor) and the Javan Eagle and many other species with genetic potential for the future”. Ironically, the list includes the Javan tiger, believed extinct since 1980. Its only mention of the tens of thousands of people living in the new park is as a ‘socio-cultural attraction’ connected with local supernatural beliefs plus the traditional Javanese architecture of villages like Turgo. Right from the start, experts fromGadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta (UGM) advised officials that in-depth studies of the planned park area were needed and proposed intensive discussions with villagers. The NGO WALHI Jogja called for a new model of management to avoid the conflicts between the government and indigenous communities which characterise so many of Indonesia’s national parks. It proposed that a consortium of local stakeholders should have overall control. The university and local NGOs held several public meetings to discuss the proposal, with local government officials on the platform. Local authorities reassured anxious village heads of Klaten, Sleman, Magelang and Boyolali who had set up the Paguyuban Sabuk Gunung Merapi – an association to promote solidarity between affected communities. They said the park plans were only at the ‘concept’ stage; there would be full consultation and that local people would be given a major role in forest management. In May, the Sultan told members of the Merapi Community Local Forum that the plans would not be rushed. The villagers and NGOs had greeted an official visit to Kaliurang by four ministers from Jakarta and Yoyga’s governor with a demonstration. Banners said ‘Conservation Yes! National Park No!’, ‘Listen to what we want!’ and ‘Merapi belongs to the people, not to conglomerates’. However, the plans were pushed through by forestry department staff from Jakarta, Yogya and Central Java with no genuine consultation. A series of meetings were held in various sub-districts where people were told what a national park was and that their area was to become part of one. Government officials brushed aside any resistance, claiming that all the communities agreed with the park plans with only minor reservations. “We will not wait until everybody gives their approval. We won’t collect signatures to show approval. The  Gunung Merapi National Park project will proceed and it will be inaugurated in October this year,” the head of a team set up to gather local opinions told journalists in August. Bewildered villagers Many local people are concerned about their livelihoods. They are worried that they will no longer be allowed to collect volcanic sand for building materials or to gather firewood or fodder for their animals and that they will be marginalised by conservation measures, even though forestry officials have publicly stated that no-one will be evicted from the new park. One villager is quoted in a local news report: “How can we be sure that our people will get new jobs? When they determined the zoning of the national park, they did not involve us in discussing this matter. So, we may not have a chance to be forest rangers”. Another feared that, “It will be outsiders who gain most benefit from the park. We locals will just be left to watch the process”. Communities in the Merapi-Merbabu area have set up a number of action groups. At meetings, forestry staff have talked of ‘community and domestic resources-based development’, but exactly what this means is still far from clear. No detailed plans have been released: the management plan is still being prepared by a team of consultants, headed by UGM professor Joko Sumarsono. Local NGOs accuse the authorities of lack of transparency and of giving biodiversity conservation much higher priority than community livelihoods.

WALHI Jogja repeatedly called for the national park plan to be postponed so that the concept of the national park and plans for its management could be clearly explained to villagers. “Otherwise, there will always be resistance on the part of the community because in the drawing up of the policy on the national park, the role and the position of the community were simply neglected,” said Fajar Irawan, WALHI Jogja’s programme manager. But these calls were in vain. Within a week of the inauguration, 300 ha of forest was destroyed by fires at Kaliurang. Local residents and conservation staff succeeded in preventing the fires from spreading further.

(Sources: Bernas 27/Nov/01, 4/Mar/02; Kompas 3/Jan/02, 14/Aug/02; Suara Merdeka 15/Jan/02; Pikiran Rakyat 20/Apr/02, 23/Apr/02, 1/May/02; Walhi Jogja email 5/May/02; Warta Walhi Sept 02; Jakarta Post 3/Oct/02; Sinar Harapan 21/Oct/02.)

Iklan

3 Komentar so far
Tinggalkan komentar

Howdy! I just would like to give you a huge thumbs up for the great information you’ve got here on this post. I will be coming back to your web site for more soon.

Komentar oleh Gilda

Hiya! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask.
Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest writing
a blog post or vice-versa? My website discusses a lot of the same topics as yours and I
feel we could greatly benefit from each other.
If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail.
I look forward to hearing from you! Awesome blog by the way!

Komentar oleh Vedi la pagina Web

Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.
Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Many thanks

Komentar oleh Freddie




Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s



%d blogger menyukai ini: